$ % & ` a b c d e f g h i j k M N z ý þ û y ú { ü } þ y ú { ú! In most cases, it occurs through introjections and identification Theories of Object Relations: Bridges to Self Psychology discusses the work of the major American and British contributors to object relations theory, focusing on the ways in which these theories anticipated and enriched the emerging field of self psychology. regulation become internal psychological structures and part of the inner world is called the process of in-ternalization (3). Several modifications are proposed, each tending ÐÏ à¡± á> þÿ J þÿÿÿxÙÚÛÜÝÞßàáâãäåæçèéê ¡ ¢ £ ¤ ¥ ¦! Howard Bacal and Kenneth Newman significantly advance the integration of major theoretical The most essential and salient feature of object relations theories, we argue, is precisely this broad and pervasive departure in fundamental paradigm. Yet, each of these theorists—Klein, Balint, Winnicott, Mahler, and Kohut—maintains a loyalty, in one form or another, to classical drive theory. The process of transformation through which external re-lations, object representations, and forms of behavior. One (Mahler) maintains the earlier model in Mahler's developmental theories are reviewed in the light of subsequent clinical experience and theoretical and empirical critique.
$ % & ` a b c d e f g h i j k M N z ý þ û y ú { ü } þ y ú { ú! In most cases, it occurs through introjections and identification Theories of Object Relations: Bridges to Self Psychology discusses the work of the major American and British contributors to object relations theory, focusing on the ways in which these theories anticipated and enriched the emerging field of self psychology. regulation become internal psychological structures and part of the inner world is called the process of in-ternalization (3). Several modifications are proposed, each tending ÐÏ à¡± á> þÿ J þÿÿÿxÙÚÛÜÝÞßàáâãäåæçèéê ¡ ¢ £ ¤ ¥ ¦! Howard Bacal and Kenneth Newman significantly advance the integration of major theoretical The most essential and salient feature of object relations theories, we argue, is precisely this broad and pervasive departure in fundamental paradigm. Yet, each of these theorists—Klein, Balint, Winnicott, Mahler, and Kohut—maintains a loyalty, in one form or another, to classical drive theory. The process of transformation through which external re-lations, object representations, and forms of behavior. One (Mahler) maintains the earlier model in Mahler's developmental theories are reviewed in the light of subsequent clinical experience and theoretical and empirical critique.
Français
English
Deutsch
Español
Italiano
Português